<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for </title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lacan.com/thevideos/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lacan.com/thevideos</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2012 20:09:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Slavoj ŽižekEcology: A New Opium of the Masses by Marina V.</title>
		<link>http://www.lacan.com/thevideos/?p=14&#038;cpage=1#comment-24203</link>
		<dc:creator>Marina V.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2012 20:09:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lacan.com/thevideos/?p=14#comment-24203</guid>
		<description>As far as Mr. Zizek&#039;s lecture is considered (Ecology - A new Opium of the Masses), capitalism may seem concrete, but it&#039;s like the way he mentioned Bill Gage, something which is frozen. And, they all tend to depend on this, otherwise they are considered to be &quot;against his law&quot;, like he is god or something.

Let&#039;s think that most times, people are absorbed by something else, like catastrophes, etc., though they know they have to fight for their future, for the market, for their making ends living. Though, they don&#039;t cause there are impressed by people running companies like WWF, let&#039;s say, who fight for something or someone&#039;s good or for nature&#039;s good, though they are the richest.


But, on the other hand, they haven&#039;t got even a penny for themselves and they try to do something for such companies! This is the appearance of the Big Other. They feel underestimated in front of them, cause they think that if they don&#039;t do something immediately, they will be guilty, they feel remorses for something that they don&#039;t even know! They never know what is happening behind all these and they forget themselves.


As for the appearance, I think that Lacan is right! It&#039;s our inside, nothing superficial, there always can be a New Subject, but through psychoanalysis, otherwise we can&#039;t meet what is inside us, what we hide. The unconscious can never be discovered at all, it can be written, but not understood... So, I conclude that appearance is not the blood inside us or that someone has to think our body inside, but our soul inside and how we &quot;cultivate&quot; it. The Big Other will always be our mystery, this is the mystery for us, for the reason that we never know when we will meet the Big Other! And, this uncertainty might make us feel depressed, but this is our creativity in depth...

Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as Mr. Zizek&#8217;s lecture is considered (Ecology &#8211; A new Opium of the Masses), capitalism may seem concrete, but it&#8217;s like the way he mentioned Bill Gage, something which is frozen. And, they all tend to depend on this, otherwise they are considered to be &#8220;against his law&#8221;, like he is god or something.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s think that most times, people are absorbed by something else, like catastrophes, etc., though they know they have to fight for their future, for the market, for their making ends living. Though, they don&#8217;t cause there are impressed by people running companies like WWF, let&#8217;s say, who fight for something or someone&#8217;s good or for nature&#8217;s good, though they are the richest.</p>
<p>But, on the other hand, they haven&#8217;t got even a penny for themselves and they try to do something for such companies! This is the appearance of the Big Other. They feel underestimated in front of them, cause they think that if they don&#8217;t do something immediately, they will be guilty, they feel remorses for something that they don&#8217;t even know! They never know what is happening behind all these and they forget themselves.</p>
<p>As for the appearance, I think that Lacan is right! It&#8217;s our inside, nothing superficial, there always can be a New Subject, but through psychoanalysis, otherwise we can&#8217;t meet what is inside us, what we hide. The unconscious can never be discovered at all, it can be written, but not understood&#8230; So, I conclude that appearance is not the blood inside us or that someone has to think our body inside, but our soul inside and how we &#8220;cultivate&#8221; it. The Big Other will always be our mystery, this is the mystery for us, for the reason that we never know when we will meet the Big Other! And, this uncertainty might make us feel depressed, but this is our creativity in depth&#8230;</p>
<p>Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Slavoj ŽižekThe Euthanasia of Tolerant Reason by Marina V.</title>
		<link>http://www.lacan.com/thevideos/?p=1&#038;cpage=1#comment-24200</link>
		<dc:creator>Marina V.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2012 20:02:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lacan.com/thevideos/?p=1#comment-24200</guid>
		<description>As far as the Part III ( The Euthanasia of Tolerant Reason) of Mr. Zizek&#039;s referrals, words can unite us, but even more divide us. They might make us pieces. Even in psychoanalysis, this may happen.

I agree with him, when saying that people might talk with each other and they suddenly conclude that they say different things. Total violence! Both of them are wounded psychologically, either they are men and women or women and women, or even men and men.

And, there we can find the aggressive side of someone. Though, we can hear that I say that, but you say something else, though both saying the same! Here is the most violent point, I think, as different human beings can&#039;t speak the same language and it is normal, but sometimes, when we talk to people for the first time, we might be insulted because of that or they might feel the same!

Moreover, if we continue such conversations, we have to be sure that nobody will trasgress our limits, otherwise we just become objects. And, being sure means believing in ourselves.

Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as the Part III ( The Euthanasia of Tolerant Reason) of Mr. Zizek&#8217;s referrals, words can unite us, but even more divide us. They might make us pieces. Even in psychoanalysis, this may happen.</p>
<p>I agree with him, when saying that people might talk with each other and they suddenly conclude that they say different things. Total violence! Both of them are wounded psychologically, either they are men and women or women and women, or even men and men.</p>
<p>And, there we can find the aggressive side of someone. Though, we can hear that I say that, but you say something else, though both saying the same! Here is the most violent point, I think, as different human beings can&#8217;t speak the same language and it is normal, but sometimes, when we talk to people for the first time, we might be insulted because of that or they might feel the same!</p>
<p>Moreover, if we continue such conversations, we have to be sure that nobody will trasgress our limits, otherwise we just become objects. And, being sure means believing in ourselves.</p>
<p>Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Slavoj ŽižekCan One Really Tolerate A Neighbor? by Lionpsyche</title>
		<link>http://www.lacan.com/thevideos/?p=29&#038;cpage=1#comment-24178</link>
		<dc:creator>Lionpsyche</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2012 16:55:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lacan.com/thevideos/?p=29#comment-24178</guid>
		<description>I agree with Mr. Zizek, nature comes from catastrophes, is a catastrophe and no divine powers can do anything about that. Divine powers are used for strategic reasons from each nation, such powers can be called universal, in my opinion.

Moreover, if we weren&#039;t afraid and in the search of our own identities, we wouldn&#039;t have been called human beings, speaking beings, the ones who are amissed from the time they talk... And the symptoms are the ones who calls us to face our fears and anxieties. So, yes, fear can be creative, but terrorism no.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Mr. Zizek, nature comes from catastrophes, is a catastrophe and no divine powers can do anything about that. Divine powers are used for strategic reasons from each nation, such powers can be called universal, in my opinion.</p>
<p>Moreover, if we weren&#8217;t afraid and in the search of our own identities, we wouldn&#8217;t have been called human beings, speaking beings, the ones who are amissed from the time they talk&#8230; And the symptoms are the ones who calls us to face our fears and anxieties. So, yes, fear can be creative, but terrorism no.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Éric Laurent, Marie-Hélène Brousse, Pierre-Gilles GuéguenPULSE: Paris-US Lacan Seminar by Lionpsyche</title>
		<link>http://www.lacan.com/thevideos/?p=457&#038;cpage=1#comment-24177</link>
		<dc:creator>Lionpsyche</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 22:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lacan.com/thevideos/?p=457#comment-24177</guid>
		<description>As far as the last video is considered, I think that Words are the ones who hurt the flesh and that&#039;s why we have got the symptoms. Each symptom has got its materiality and this makes each human being have a man and a woman inside him/her, as Lacan has already said.

Semblant might have to do with psyche, a word including both soul and body, something that is different for each one of us and we can only understand our semblant through psychoanalysis.
Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as the last video is considered, I think that Words are the ones who hurt the flesh and that&#8217;s why we have got the symptoms. Each symptom has got its materiality and this makes each human being have a man and a woman inside him/her, as Lacan has already said.</p>
<p>Semblant might have to do with psyche, a word including both soul and body, something that is different for each one of us and we can only understand our semblant through psychoanalysis.<br />
Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Éric Laurent, Marie-Hélène Brousse, Pierre-Gilles GuéguenPULSE: Paris-US Lacan Seminar by Lionpsyche</title>
		<link>http://www.lacan.com/thevideos/?p=457&#038;cpage=1#comment-24173</link>
		<dc:creator>Lionpsyche</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2012 22:13:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lacan.com/thevideos/?p=457#comment-24173</guid>
		<description>According to Ms. Marie-Hélène Brousse and &quot;Beyond Prince Charming and Pink Swords&quot;, let&#039;s think about today&#039;s toys, but also clothes for children called &quot;unisex&quot;, like Ms. Brousse said a situation of multiplication.

The Phallic order as Oral one is an action, we talk to each other, but the same is with &quot;Killing&quot;. And, masochism refers to people who kill others&#039; feelings, taking their revenge, vengeance (same emphasis the two words..., same tone, punctuation), because they are afraid of Real Love. And Fear emerges aggressiveness.

The same Other someone will Love is not all the others, but let&#039;s consider people who have the desire of women having everything or vice-versa, the same with women...


Unconsciously, we might know that this will never happen, as something always escapes and either women or men become objects of such situations believing they love, a kind of too expensive Love, indeed! Expensive in feelings, as well, which might not be pure, as Ms. Brousse said.

Even if we search for purity, in my opinion we know, but we can&#039;t accept that such purity is black... or a kind of purity with a black hole..., which will always hurt us.
Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to Ms. Marie-Hélène Brousse and &#8220;Beyond Prince Charming and Pink Swords&#8221;, let&#8217;s think about today&#8217;s toys, but also clothes for children called &#8220;unisex&#8221;, like Ms. Brousse said a situation of multiplication.</p>
<p>The Phallic order as Oral one is an action, we talk to each other, but the same is with &#8220;Killing&#8221;. And, masochism refers to people who kill others&#8217; feelings, taking their revenge, vengeance (same emphasis the two words&#8230;, same tone, punctuation), because they are afraid of Real Love. And Fear emerges aggressiveness.</p>
<p>The same Other someone will Love is not all the others, but let&#8217;s consider people who have the desire of women having everything or vice-versa, the same with women&#8230;</p>
<p>Unconsciously, we might know that this will never happen, as something always escapes and either women or men become objects of such situations believing they love, a kind of too expensive Love, indeed! Expensive in feelings, as well, which might not be pure, as Ms. Brousse said.</p>
<p>Even if we search for purity, in my opinion we know, but we can&#8217;t accept that such purity is black&#8230; or a kind of purity with a black hole&#8230;, which will always hurt us.<br />
Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Éric Laurent, Marie-Hélène Brousse, Pierre-Gilles GuéguenPULSE: Paris-US Lacan Seminar by Marina V.</title>
		<link>http://www.lacan.com/thevideos/?p=457&#038;cpage=1#comment-24158</link>
		<dc:creator>Marina V.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2012 19:07:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lacan.com/thevideos/?p=457#comment-24158</guid>
		<description>Dr. Laurent has to say a lot in the second video, as well! We all try to find verifications, even as human beings, let us think the scientists who only try to assure us - but first of all themselves - through their statistics! We never know if they are true of false, though...

As Lacan says on &quot;Television&quot;, people need to be sure, but they don&#039;t know what they believe. Death sustains us, so that we can bear our lives... For more:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d3dI4Nl3ENY&amp;feature=related

But, Dr. Laurent made me think of the line between true and real, we need to say the truth, but are we totally say it?

And, do we remain the same when facing the real...?
Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dr. Laurent has to say a lot in the second video, as well! We all try to find verifications, even as human beings, let us think the scientists who only try to assure us &#8211; but first of all themselves &#8211; through their statistics! We never know if they are true of false, though&#8230;</p>
<p>As Lacan says on &#8220;Television&#8221;, people need to be sure, but they don&#8217;t know what they believe. Death sustains us, so that we can bear our lives&#8230; For more:<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d3dI4Nl3ENY&#038;feature=related" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d3dI4Nl3ENY&#038;feature=related</a></p>
<p>But, Dr. Laurent made me think of the line between true and real, we need to say the truth, but are we totally say it?</p>
<p>And, do we remain the same when facing the real&#8230;?<br />
Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Éric Laurent, Marie-Hélène Brousse, Pierre-Gilles GuéguenPULSE: Paris-US Lacan Seminar by Marina V.</title>
		<link>http://www.lacan.com/thevideos/?p=457&#038;cpage=1#comment-24157</link>
		<dc:creator>Marina V.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2012 18:56:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lacan.com/thevideos/?p=457#comment-24157</guid>
		<description>As far as the first video of Dr. Eric Laurent is concerned, he is so specific! He let us know some things about Dr. Lacan with... holes. Though, he analyses all the symptoms and he is to the point.

I agree with him about erotomaniacs. Yes, a woman always asks for a confirmation from her boyfriend, fiancee, husband. And this is because she is his object, unfortunately. That&#039;s why she accepts everything from him. Nonetheless, she is always asking is she is the perfect, the one the man always wanted and needed and this usually happens to the women who have not met the Name of the Symbolic Father.

They always tried to find another Real Father on the face of a man... So, they need to be the best daughters if we think it more deeply.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as the first video of Dr. Eric Laurent is concerned, he is so specific! He let us know some things about Dr. Lacan with&#8230; holes. Though, he analyses all the symptoms and he is to the point.</p>
<p>I agree with him about erotomaniacs. Yes, a woman always asks for a confirmation from her boyfriend, fiancee, husband. And this is because she is his object, unfortunately. That&#8217;s why she accepts everything from him. Nonetheless, she is always asking is she is the perfect, the one the man always wanted and needed and this usually happens to the women who have not met the Name of the Symbolic Father.</p>
<p>They always tried to find another Real Father on the face of a man&#8230; So, they need to be the best daughters if we think it more deeply.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Slavoj ŽižekLove Without Mercy by Marina V.</title>
		<link>http://www.lacan.com/thevideos/?p=56&#038;cpage=1#comment-24119</link>
		<dc:creator>Marina V.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 11:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lacan.com/thevideos/?p=56#comment-24119</guid>
		<description>In my opinion, as far as the first video is considered where Ms. Ayerza has chose great quotes talking to the point, absolute fidelity is the absolute form of betrayal.

Dr. Lacan didn&#039;t say that we have to sacrifice everything and many nowadays sacrifice even their own souls, especially towards the Big Other.

In addition, orthodox religion talks about Love, but do all these people believe in Love? This emotion might become catastrophic in the Name of God, in the Name of the Father, in other words... And, yes, a god always need someone called Judas, so that he can be called &quot;heroe&quot;.

Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my opinion, as far as the first video is considered where Ms. Ayerza has chose great quotes talking to the point, absolute fidelity is the absolute form of betrayal.</p>
<p>Dr. Lacan didn&#8217;t say that we have to sacrifice everything and many nowadays sacrifice even their own souls, especially towards the Big Other.</p>
<p>In addition, orthodox religion talks about Love, but do all these people believe in Love? This emotion might become catastrophic in the Name of God, in the Name of the Father, in other words&#8230; And, yes, a god always need someone called Judas, so that he can be called &#8220;heroe&#8221;.</p>
<p>Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
